One of the darkest efforts in “science” is the way Wikipedia treats homeopathy. No experts on homeopathy are allowed to edit the wikipedia entry. As a result, amateurs pound out a negative and innaccurate pharmaceutically driven party line against homeopathy.
Apparently, this editorial prerogative and even paid editing is common in the darker corridors of Wikipedia:
“And anonymous Wikipedia editors maintain a stranglehold on selected topics. Kohs demonstrates with the case of Morgellons. The Mayo Clinic calls it “an unexplained skin disorder characterized by sores.” But the Wikipedia page dismisses Morgellons as a “delusional belief.”
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: homeopathy and wikipedia |
Official Homeopathy Resource 
Is like that. I have tried many times to introduce scientific sources and after somo minutes, a human mice device erases what I put.